Talk about Big Brother

[tonymidd]

how do feel about having your camera disabled?????

http://www.gatech.edu/news-room/release.php?id=1017

[robbie-doux]

Won't people already taking pictures and filming in unauthorised places just go back to film?

[tonymidd]

Won't people already taking pictures and filming in unauthorised places just go back to film?

What happens when you can't buy film? :cray:

[robbie-doux]

Good point.

[england1965]

I'd hate to be looking down a camera lens when some idiot shines a white laser down the lens ..Hmmm..new eye-balls anyone

[Kirsty]

I agree people will find ways to go around it. And yes that would sort of hurt!! lol!

[richardtm]

how do feel about having your camera disabled?????




The article seems to think that this device will not pick up a DSLR, because the sensor is hidden by the mirror. I wonder if a polarising filter would have a similar effect, if only because it would change the apparent brightness/colour of whatever sensor was behind it?

In any case, if I am not taking unauthorised pictures in a dodgy place, why should I worry (about the camera)? Now freedom is a different matter. If someone attempts to disable my camera in a public place where I am legally entitled to take pictures, then surely THEY are committing a crime.

[tonymidd]

[quote=richardtm]The article seems to think that this device will not pick up a DSLR, because the sensor is hidden by the mirror. I wonder if a polarising filter would have a similar effect, if only because it would change the apparent brightness/colour of whatever sensor was behind it?

I thought that butr at the moment of exposure the sensor is exposed so the device could work. Interesting point abot the polarising filter, don't know the answer.

In any case, if I am not taking unauthorised pictures in a dodgy place, why should I worry (about the camera)?

Some people have funny ideas about where you can take pics, the National Trust for one.


Now freedom is a different matter. If someone attempts to disable my camera in a public place where I am legally entitled to take pictures, then surely THEY are committing a crime.

Try proving it:grin::grin::getmecoat:

[richardtm]

Some people have funny ideas about where you can take pics, the National Trust for one

Odd. Never had any problem with National trust, or English Heritage for that matter. There are a few parts of some sites where they don't want you to take pics, but they are usually clearly marked. Apparently it's because so many people with P&S Auto Everything cameras seem unable to control the flash, and the bright flash (lots of them, time and time again) can cause deterioration in fabrics, fading of colours etc. Problem is, they are usually too confined to allow you to use a tripod, so you couldn't take a picture without flash even if you can control it.

Alternative reason: helps sell more postcards and guide books:)

[lostmysnorkel]

National Trust places are private property aren't they? Just because somewhere is open to the public doesn't give you thesame rights as a public place.

Personally, I have never had a problem with NT and similar places, if you approach them with a reasonable request and offer something in return they aer usually quite helpful.


Still, the thought of someone disabling my camera is a bit worrying - how do I get it to wrork again once I have left the area?

I would hope that they would be forced into placing clear warning signs around the place.

[Gadget]

I know some of you will doubt its really me when you read this but........

I can see two very positive uses for this equipment. The first is in movie theatres to inhibit piracy of new films and lest face it as photographers we all support the protection of copyright; don't we??
Second is a counter espionage device in reseach labs or design studios or even advertising agencies.
On brighter note I really can't see this devise being used at a sporting event or some other sort of public space or event, the risk of litigation is really just too high.
sorry just read the article again and both my areas are mentioned...doh!! but still thats its real use not to attack us, anyway even if say a premier league football team had this kit at somepoint in the future how would it know between the accredited and the bloke in the cheap seats?
So, no i really can't see this kit being used too widely...give me five years and i'll probably have to take that back.