PDA

View Full Version : Showing Difference Between 3sec@1600 and 30sec@400iso

StagePhotography.co.uk
7th October 2006, 11:34 PM
Showing Difference Between 3sec@1600 and 30sec@400iso

Fujifilm S3 Pro...
Bindii
8th October 2006, 01:19 AM
The first one is the better one in my opinion...

although I am not 100% sure on what it is exactly..I'm thinking maybe water and a reflection from some sticks or rocks maybe?
StagePhotography.co.uk
8th October 2006, 01:27 AM
Yup...

But it's just an example of noise...
Bindii
8th October 2006, 01:34 AM
Yup...

But it's just an example of noise...

Yeah I had figured that...actually it is great to see them side by to compare the noise differences....great idea! :)
tonymidd
8th October 2006, 08:45 AM
The ISO 1600 should have had 4 sec to give the same exposure as 16 sec at ISO400 assuming the aperture was the same.
StagePhotography.co.uk
8th October 2006, 01:37 PM
The ISO 1600 should have had 4 sec to give the same exposure as 16 sec at ISO400 assuming the aperture was the same.

I actually thought that at the time, but said "sod it"
why follow the norm..... :)
tonymidd
8th October 2006, 02:02 PM
I actually thought that at the time, but said "sod it"
why follow the norm..... :)

Depends what you were trying to prove
FDPiech
9th October 2006, 12:59 PM
Big difference...
Eastern_herp
9th October 2006, 01:15 PM
I don't know if digital suffers from reciprocity law? 1600 iso will always give higher noise